<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fka200.com &#187; icann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fka200.com/tag/icann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fka200.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 01:49:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canon to begin acquisition of the &#8220;.canon&#8221; Top-Level Domain name</title>
		<link>http://www.fka200.com/2010/05/15/canon-to-begin-acquisition-of-the-canon-top-level-domain-name/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fka200.com/2010/05/15/canon-to-begin-acquisition-of-the-canon-top-level-domain-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 05:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Ashouri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fka200.com/?p=1207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.canon.com/news/2010/mar16e.html TOKYO, March 16, 2010—Canon Inc. announced today that it will begin the acquisition process for the top-level domain name &#8220;.canon,&#8221; based on the new generic Top Level Domain (gTLD) registration system. The non-profit organization ICANN (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), which maintains and regulates the Internet&#8217;s addressing system, has rigorously evaluated the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fka200.com/2010/05/15/canon-to-begin-acquisition-of-the-canon-top-level-domain-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;domain names themselves just don&#8217;t matter that much nowadays&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.fka200.com/2009/07/08/domain-names-themselves-just-dont-matter-that-much-nowadays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fka200.com/2009/07/08/domain-names-themselves-just-dont-matter-that-much-nowadays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Ashouri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tlds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fka200.com/?p=941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not posting that often, but definitely keeping up with my domain news. Read this interesting article today that says: domain names themselves just don&#8217;t matter that much nowadays. Web browsers have gotten a lot smarter since the 1990s, and they&#8217;re now pretty good at determining what we want when we type in names that have [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fka200.com/2009/07/08/domain-names-themselves-just-dont-matter-that-much-nowadays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protecting Brands Article &#8211; Unlimited New TLDs Like .domaining or .media</title>
		<link>http://www.fka200.com/2009/04/07/protecting-brands-article-unlimited-new-tlds-like-domaining-or-media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fka200.com/2009/04/07/protecting-brands-article-unlimited-new-tlds-like-domaining-or-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Ashouri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new tlds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tlds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fka200.com/?p=875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s always been known that protecting a brand (or hell, even starting one) online is a pretty hard thing to do with the vast majority of TLDs available to developers/companies. Mainstream news has been catching onto ICANN&#8217;s little &#8220;get your own tld&#8221; pitch it has been making recently. Along with zillions of gtlds + cctlds [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fka200.com/2009/04/07/protecting-brands-article-unlimited-new-tlds-like-domaining-or-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dynadot Grace Policy Change &#8211; How Will It Change Your Business Model?</title>
		<link>http://www.fka200.com/2009/03/23/dynadot-grace-policy-change-how-will-it-change-your-business-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fka200.com/2009/03/23/dynadot-grace-policy-change-how-will-it-change-your-business-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Ashouri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynadot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grace delete change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fka200.com/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We recently had an outtage from Dynadot which left a semi-bitter taste in the mouths of some. What is going on now is a domain grace delete policy change. Now this isn&#8217;t exactly the fault of Dynadot, but it&#8217;s in reply to the domain tasters in mass. You know, the average joe that buys 1-3 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fka200.com/2009/03/23/dynadot-grace-policy-change-how-will-it-change-your-business-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Domain Grace Period Deletions Policy Change From ICANN</title>
		<link>http://www.fka200.com/2008/12/19/domain-grace-period-deletions-policy-change-from-icann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fka200.com/2008/12/19/domain-grace-period-deletions-policy-change-from-icann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 04:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sammy Ashouri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Domaining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dynadot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grace deletions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fka200.com/?p=610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An email has just been sent out by domain registrar Dynadot regarding grace deletions. Apparently, ICANN released a statement severely limiting the use of grace deletions compared to the current system. According to the new policy, it seems that registrars have a max of &#8220;10% or 50 threshold maximum number of AGP deletes per top-level [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fka200.com/2008/12/19/domain-grace-period-deletions-policy-change-from-icann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

